Loading variety overview…
World of CitrusWorld of CitrusKinnow Mandarin
University of California, Riverside — Citrus Variety Collection
https://citrusvariety.ucr.edu/crc3021 (opens in a new tab)
Accessed
Simran Singh and Tanjeet Singh Chahal · Journal of Applied Horticulture · 2021
https://horticultureresearch.net/jah/2021_23_1_93_98.pdf (opens in a new tab)
Journal of Applied Horticulture 23(1):93–98, DOI 10.37855/jah.2021.v23i01.18. Study at Fruit Research Station, Jallowal-Lesriwal, Jalandhar, India, during 2016–17: nursery performance of 15 rootstocks and budding compatibility with Kinnow mandarin. Table 4 p.5 gives Rich 16-6 root length 15.3 cm; Table 5 p.5 gives plant dry weight 3.6 g at buddable stage and 46.4% Kinnow budtake. Overlaps 2019 Singh et al. publication/seedling program; not independent replication.
Accessed
Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad; Tahir Mahmood Qureshi; Muhammad Zia; Maham Mushtaq; Muhammad Waheed Iqbal; Ilaria Cacciotti; Tuba Esatbeyoglu; Sameh A. Korma · Measurement: Food / Elsevier · 2024-03-18
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275924000224 (opens in a new tab)
Open-access CC BY-NC article, Measurement: Food 14 (2024), article 100155; DOI 10.1016/j.meafoo.2024.100155. Full 13-page publisher article recovered from Deutsche Nationalbibliothek copy at https://d-nb.info/1387615173/34. Samples were Kinnow-labeled orchard fruit from 75 orchards in Sargodha, Bhalwal and Kot Momin, Pakistan (Oct 2021–Jan 2022), with top/center/bottom canopy sampling; the paper identifies no clone/accession or rootstock. Its measured traits show regional, orchard-size and canopy-position variation; treat measurements as study-specific, not cultivar-wide.
Accessed
B. A. Malla; A. Rastogi; R. K. Sharma; A. Ishfaq; J. Farooq · Veterinary World · 2015-01-06
https://www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.8/January-2015/4.pdf (opens in a new tab)
Open-access research article (CC BY 2.0), Veterinary World 8(1):19–23; DOI 10.14202/vetworld.2015.19-23. Tests Kinnow mandarin processing waste silage for adult male goats, not fresh fruit. Kinnow peel/pulp as processing by-products is contextual text citing prior work; experimental measurements concern ensiled waste and goat feed. Official journal PDF: five pages.
Accessed
Manoj Kumar Mahawar; Kirti Jalgaonkar; Bhushan Bibwe; Bharat Bhushan; Vijay Singh Meena; Raj Kumar Sonkar · Journal of Food Science and Technology / Springer Nature · 2020-03 (online 2019-09-10)
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7026342/ (opens in a new tab)
Review article; J Food Sci Technol 57(3):799–815; DOI 10.1007/s13197-019-04083-z. PMC page access was recaptcha-limited, but indexed PMC full-text output exposed the morphology section and Table 1. It describes Kinnow as oblate with flattened poles and cites a few seeds adherent to 9–10 segments; its Table 1 separately reports 19.40 ± 9.28 seeds without sample identity/design in the recovered excerpt. This secondary, internally divergent evidence must remain qualified and should not be treated as a single accession or fruit evaluation.
Accessed
Arizona Fruit Trees · YouTube · 2017-11-14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHmHZ5lb1b0 (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: The presenter describes one Kinnow-labelled tree’s heavy apparent fruit set and estimates it may be about 3 feet tall with probably around 100 mandarins. No exact observation date, location, age, rootstock, harvest or measured yield is stated. English auto-generated captions cover 0:00–2:19 of 2:23 displayed clip; provenance archived locally.
Accessed
Howard B. Frost · University of California Agricultural Experiment Station · 1935-12
At printed pp. 10–11, Frost reports historical Riverside fruit and plant observations for Kinnow. In a sample of 50 dissected seeds, the average embryo count was 2.7 per seed; he describes seedlings from self-pollination as nearly all nucellar. These are attributed breeding/sample reports, not measurements of a later accession.
Accessed