Lisbon Lemon
University of California, Riverside — Citrus Variety Collection
https://citrusvariety.ucr.edu/crc3176 (opens in a new tab)
Accessed
Weird Explorer · YouTube · 2021-03-31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAG3pf2ISUE (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English captions labelled authored or unspecified, 0:00–11:23. The presenter identifies one supermarket fruit as a Lisbon and tastes it; specimen origin, harvest date, rootstock, sampling method, and cultivar verification are not established.
Accessed
IV Organic · YouTube · 2017-01-26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AbC02ij2gY (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English auto-generated captions, 0:08–23:05. Los Angeles presenter’s Lisbon observations concern a pruned semi-standard tree and one cut sample; rootstock cultivar, fruit maturity, and a controlled juice comparison are not established.
Accessed
Jonathan H. Crane · UF/IFAS Extension · 2010
https://ask.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/HS402 (opens in a new tab)
HS1153/HS402. Originally published December 2010; revised November 2016, reviewed December 2019; current PDF reviewed July 2023.
Accessed
Garden Love Homestead · YouTube · Feb 9, 2026
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wnhu8JdMPM (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English auto-generated captions, 0:01–11:20. Creator Diana compares Lisbon, Meyer, and Eureka lemons. Her first Lisbon tasting is from a gifted tree; sample provenance, maturity, harvest date, and rootstock are unspecified.
Accessed
Ed Able Solutions · YouTube · Nov 7, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExY-Fw3KwZA (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English auto-generated captions, 0:00–6:25. Bianca and Ed compare Lisbon and Eureka at Frantz Wholesale Nursery in Hickman, California; Tom Spellman gives a phone comparison from Southern California. The Lisbon segment describes thick skin, a blossom-end wrinkle, and greater thorniness than Eureka. Fruit tasting at 2:03–2:41 has ambiguous cultivar identity and is excluded.
Accessed
José Luis Foguet · Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC)
Presentation date not shown. PDF p. 11 (viewer index 10, label P10), compatibility table for lemon scions: Rich 16/6 (USA) is marked yes under Lisbon and Genoa and no under Eureka. No methods or sample size stated; retain as compatibility guidance for named scions, not Rich 16-6 fruit or measured hardiness.
Accessed
L. G. Weathers; E. C. Calavan; J. M. Wallace; D. W. Christiansen · California Agriculture: The Journal of UC Agriculture and Natural Resources · November 1955
Historical comparator only: source reports Lisbon strains had not thus far shown the observed Eureka disorder; does not establish immunity.
Accessed
admin · Chickenfish — Bio · 2015-05-31
https://chickenfish.cc/bio/lemons-lisbon-eureka/ (opens in a new tab)
The author describes a Lisbon and Eureka picked on the same day in early winter. Lisbon is described as a large, thick-pithed and fragrant fruit; the pictured Lisbon is estimated at about 15 cm. The author says both trees were about five years old and Lisbon produces more slowly but prolifically once it gets to a good size, holding fruit on its branches. This is one grower’s account; site, rootstock, harvest date, and measurement method are not specified.
Accessed
Garden Love Homestead · YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYEvgbyp-4s (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English auto-generated captions, 0:00–8:50. The presenter discusses harvest timing in her stated zone 9b and tastes one lemon identified as Lisbon from a small gifted tree. She describes the sample as juicy, says no seeds were visible to her, and describes a true-lemon aroma. She calls it sour with a little sweetness; no intensity scale or chemical measurement is given. Approximate size is estimated verbally at about 3 × 2.5 inches. Exact location, rootstock, harvest date, and fruit maturity are not specified.
Accessed
Garden Love Homestead · YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN0TZ2IkilM (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: English auto-generated captions, 0:00–19:45. The presenter compares a newly gifted, in-ground Lisbon tree with an established container Eureka. Lisbon fruit is described as more egg-like than the rounder Eureka. One fallen Lisbon fruit is described as slightly rotten; another was picked from the tree. In tasting, the speaker says the Lisbon cut fruit looks less juicy and suggests recent establishment or less frequent watering may explain it; she later calls it more sour than the Eureka sample. Other wedges produce differing impressions. This is a small home comparison, not a trial; no exact location, rootstock, harvest date, maturity, or measurements are reported.
Accessed
Anna Ioannidi · Wikifarmer · 2023-06-14
https://wikifarmer.com/library/en/article/the-most-popular-lemon-tree-varieties (opens in a new tab)
Secondary profile, section “LISBON [C. limon ‘Lisbon’]”. Describes general Lisbon fruit morphology, tree form, bearing and season, plus unmeasured comparisons with Eureka; no accession, trial, sample size or measurement method is supplied. The article's qualitative taste/intensity and hardiness wording is not converted to a scored taste or measured threshold.
Accessed
George W. Garcelon (Part I); B. M. Lelong (Part II) · Sacramento: A. J. Johnston, Superintendent of State Printing · 1891
https://archive.org/details/citrusfruits00cali (opens in a new tab)
Part I by G. W. Garcelon; Lisbon lemon passage at printed p. 9 (PDF p. 11). Garcelon gives a first-person preference and qualitative tree, fruit, thorn, cull, and keeping observations. Historical opinion/report; not accession-wide measurements.
Accessed
Chiara Catalano et al. · Agriculture 12(12), article 2020 · 2022-11-26
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12122020 (opens in a new tab)
Peer-reviewed study of 39 lemon varieties and one Meyer hybrid accession in the University of Catania collection. Table 1 reports reproductive traits and Table 4 a selected seedling-origin assay; the Lisbon finding is scoped to the sampled Catania Lisbon accession, not all Lisbon trees or a verified UCR clone. The assay selected a small mixed-origin sample and does not establish a cultivar-wide rate. Stated study-year ranges conflict; Supplementary Table S1 was not retrieved.
Accessed
Prita Sari Dewi; Akira Wakana; Yuu Tanimoto; Yumiko Fujiwara; Kaori Sakai; Kohei Kajiwara · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 82(3):203–214 · 2013
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjshs1/82/3/82_203/_html/-char/en (opens in a new tab)
Primary cultivar-specific experimental evidence. Table 1 classifies embryo number and male fertility; embryo means were measured under a stereoscopic microscope in twenty seeds per cultivar, except Foster Pink and Marsh whose embryo count was not examined. Table 2 reports selected zygotic progeny from controlled crosses; it is not a percentage of all seeds that are zygotic. Material grown at Sasaguri Orchard, Kyushu University Farm, Fukuoka, Japan. Preserve the difference between parent fertility and male fertility segregating among offspring. DOI:10.2503/jjshs1.82.203. Source captured in docs/research/breeding-keywords-2026-10-10/dewi-2013.html.
Accessed