Conestoga 058 Citrange
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · March 15th, 2026
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg578061#msg578061 (opens in a new tab)
First-hand forum account, paraphrased; not an independently verified trial.
Accessed
Mulberry0126 · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 21st, 2026
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg580634#msg580634 (opens in a new tab)
First-hand forum account, paraphrased; not an independently verified trial.
Accessed
themulberries · Growing Fruit · 2026-08-22
First-hand grower observation. Leaf taste, fruit taste, young graft exposures and speculation are distinguished. Quoted nursery or World of Citrus text is not independent evidence.
Accessed
themulberries · Growing Fruit · 2026-08-22
First-hand grower observation. Leaf taste, fruit taste, young graft exposures and speculation are distinguished. Quoted nursery or World of Citrus text is not independent evidence.
Accessed
Citrus Genome Database
https://www.citrusgenomedb.org/Analysis/1829479 (opens in a new tab)
Genome resource reviewed against the CGD assembly record and existing variety identity. ZK8 is a sequenced trifoliate-orange reference relevant to the Poncirus background inherited through C-35. It is not a sequence of Conestoga 058 Citrange or its recorded parental accession, and does not establish ancestry percentages or cold tolerance.
Accessed
Citrus Genome Database
https://www.citrusgenomedb.org/Analysis/1749921 (opens in a new tab)
Genome resource reviewed against the CGD assembly record and existing variety identity. DHSO is a sweet-orange reference relevant to the sweet-orange background inherited through C-35. It is not a sequence of Conestoga 058 Citrange or Ruby sweet orange.
Accessed
The Mulberries · YouTube · 2025-06-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UX--KNY8pg (opens in a new tab)
Summary from transcript: Conestoga 058 had successful graft take on citrange rootstock after repeated graft failures on trifoliate rootstock that season (49:11–49:54).
Accessed
kumin · The Tropical Fruit Forum · Today at 04:59:27 PM (forum display; accessed 2026-09-22)
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=589854 (opens in a new tab)
Forum grower report: Conestoga 058 flowered twice, with staminate flowers both times; flowers were described as modestly fragrant with a pinkish-purple blush and elongated unopened buds. No fertility, fruit, or seed-parent result is established.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · May 3, 2020
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg387020#msg387020 (opens in a new tab)
Post #387020 reports aphid and slug attention to Conestoga 058, leaf-feeding damage on one small graftling, and a more pleasant leaf scent on the described plant. The author speculates about whether leaf scent may indicate fruit flavor; this post does not report a fruit tasting.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · May 1, 2020
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg386830#msg386830 (opens in a new tab)
Post #386830 compares the original Conestoga 058 plant in a coldframe with Conestoga 010 and 011 grafted outdoors on Poncirus after an unspecified winter. It gives no winter temperature or duration; the differing protection settings preclude treating this as a common-condition comparison.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · October 21, 2020
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg407682#msg407682 (opens in a new tab)
Post #407682 labels a monofoliate Conestoga 058 plant as 30 months from seed. The caption does not report a measured growth rate, freeze exposure, or field result.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 7, 2023
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg488666#msg488666 (opens in a new tab)
In post #488666, the author says Conestoga 058 was damaged at “15 degrees” in a tunnel and characterizes its hardiness as not exceptional. The unit is not stated for this figure; the post gives no exposure duration. Do not treat it as the separate outdoor comparison.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · January 1, 2021
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg414513#msg414513 (opens in a new tab)
In post #414513, kumin describes Conestoga 058 as in poor condition, strongly evergreen, the most citrus-like, and the least cold hardy among the hybrids. The update gives a +10 °F low to date across the group; it does not identify that low as a Conestoga 058 exposure.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · July 23, 2019
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg360177#msg360177 (opens in a new tab)
The post caption identifies Conestoga 058 as a monofoliate Segentrange sibling and describes its spines as very slender and rather long. The plants were shown before planting; the author’s planned slight protection from mid-December to mid-March is not evidence that this 058 plant received it or survived a particular winter.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · February 9, 2021
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg417669#msg417669 (opens in a new tab)
The author captions the original Conestoga 058 tree as nearing three years old and describes it as the most citrus-like and least hardy of the seedlings, with the longest spines among the author’s trees, slender rather than stout like Poncirus. A separate caption identifies a grafted 058 plant on Poncirus at 16 months post-grafting; keep that plant distinct from the original tree.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · November 12, 2021
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg444656#msg444656 (opens in a new tab)
The author describes the original Conestoga 058 selection as vigorous, with good graft takes, remaining dormant later in spring and growing late into autumn. Bruised leaves were fragrant. A graft of this tree survived outdoors the prior winter with considerable cold damage. Anticipated fruit tasting is not a result.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 13, 2022
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg457698#msg457698 (opens in a new tab)
The author says Conestoga 058 is evergreen, quite vigorous, and the most citrus-like and least hardy of the two selections discussed in this sentence; it lacks Poncirus-like winter bud scales. The author predicts it may flower during the initial spring flush, which is not a reported flowering observation.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · August 8, 2022
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg468289#msg468289 (opens in a new tab)
The author describes Conestoga 058 as a vigorous four-year-old tree that had not fruited yet, and captions its upper branches as largely monofoliate. The post separately shows a four-year-old A-026 fruit; do not assign that fruit to Conestoga 058.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · November 3, 2024
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg538789#msg538789 (opens in a new tab)
The author captioned autumn coloration of Conestoga 058 foliage as the most brilliant among the author’s plants. This is a subjective comparison, not a measured color assessment.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · September 26, 2023
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg503405#msg503405 (opens in a new tab)
The post states that Conestoga 058 has mostly monofoliate leaves and is less hardy than 067. The separate statement that 067 survived 2 °F with high winds last December belongs to 067 and is not a 058 temperature result.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · January 31, 2025
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg545217#msg545217 (opens in a new tab)
The author reports that Conestoga 058 was no longer being grown outdoors because of cold sensitivity. The post separately describes recurring dieback in 067 and survival by grafting on Poncirus; that 067 statement is not assigned to 058.
Accessed
Wahl · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 8, 2025
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=552550 (opens in a new tab)
Wahl reports that Conestoga 058 did not make it through the winter condition being discussed, in comparison with Conestoga 067. No specific temperature, exposure duration, or measurement method is stated for Conestoga 058.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 8, 2025
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=552551 (opens in a new tab)
Kumin reports that Conestoga 058 did not survive outdoors in his garden. This is a separate grower and garden from Wahl's #775 report; Kumin does not assign a temperature to 058 in this post.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · April 9, 2025
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=552606 (opens in a new tab)
Reply 780 reports a flower bud on a seven-year-old Conestoga 058 plant, aromatic predominantly monofoliate leaves, and the author's subjective ranking of this selection as least hardy among the Conestogas. The post gives no measured hardiness result.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · July 25, 2025
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=562630 (opens in a new tab)
Reply 840 reports that Conestoga 058 produced a staminate flower and its pollen was applied to Poncirus Plus flowers. The post says about six recipient flowers set fruit and hopes for viable seed; it reports no viable seed or measured fertility outcome.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · September 22, 2026
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?msg=589863 (opens in a new tab)
Reply 993 says the original Conestoga 058 plant is own-rooted and most additional plants are grafted onto Collins trifoliate rootstock. No graft dates or comparative graft outcomes are given.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · November 25, 2019
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg372939#msg372939 (opens in a new tab)
The author says the seeds were planted April 12, 2018, germinated in a heated bed and field-transplanted in early June 2018; the seedlings were 9–10 months old at the winter low. This is a cohort-level setup report, not a report of the specific winter exposure or embryo origin of Conestoga 058.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · February 3, 2019
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg343000#msg343000 (opens in a new tab)
The author says the seed parent was F1 C-35 citrange, while the pollen parent had no definitive identification and could have been another citrange or citrumelo. The statement concerns the seed lot/population; it does not establish the embryo origin of an individual selection.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · May 3, 2020
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg387069#msg387069 (opens in a new tab)
The author identifies #058 as one of two monofoliate original survivors and says the photo was taken before survivor numbers were assigned. He says the pictured plant is likely the one in back, so the photo position is uncertain. The post supports later identification in the trial, not an exact selection date or numerical hardiness threshold.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · January 25, 2019
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg342327#msg342327 (opens in a new tab)
The author describes the initial Conestoga F2 seedling cohort: 20,000+ seedlings, described as 85% nucellar and 15% zygotic, planted outdoors in June 2018 without cold protection. This is a population-level account; it does not identify Conestoga 058 individually or report its survival at a particular low.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · January 28, 2024
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg512404#msg512404 (opens in a new tab)
The author says Conestoga 058 and 067 were largely monofoliate and had not fruited; he reports that 058 developed reddish-purple winter coloration and was a bit less hardy than Bishop citrandarin. The separate claim that 067 was a bit hardier than Bishop is not a temperature result for 058.
Accessed
kumin · Tropical Fruit Forum · Cold Hardy Citrus · November 5, 2021
https://www.tropicalfruitforum.com/index.php?topic=30891.msg444087#msg444087 (opens in a new tab)
The author reports a branch of Conestoga 058 with red leaves during a leaf-color change and describes this clone as having the thinnest, longest spines among his trees. He says he does not know whether Ruby Blood Orange ancestry contributes to the coloration. This is one grower’s observation, not a measured color or genetic result.
Accessed